Medical and Public Health Implications
of Uranium Contamination
International
Medical Veritas Association

Uranium is
genotoxic and carcinogenic and is
associated with a whole range of harmful health effects.
The medical
and environmental consequences of contamination with
uranium compounds present both a moral and professional
responsibility to the medical profession. The increased
use of uranium compounds in industry, and more recently in
warfare in the form of depleted uranium, necessitates a
further look into the complex biomedical aspects of
internal contamination with uranium and its toxicological
consequences, both as a heavy metal and radiological
hazard.
Uranium is a
lustrous, silvery, heavy, radioactive and polyvalent
metallic element found extensively in nature which
eventually disintegrates into lead.
It is present in
air, water, and food, and thus most people come into
contact with it, and consume tiny amounts of it daily.
Uranium is a heavy metal similar to tungsten, lead,
mercury, and cadmium. Its toxic chemical characteristics
as a heavy metal are independent of its radiological
characteristics. Thus all isotopes of uranium exhibit the
same chemical behavior (reactivity) and possess identical
physical characteristics, such as melting point, boiling
point, and volatility. Because naturally occurring
uranium, enriched uranium, and depleted uranium vary only
in their isotopic mix, they are chemically identical and
exert the same chemical effects on the body. It is very
important to note that depleted uranium (DU) oxides formed
at high temperatures from the use of DU armaments are not
the same as DU metal or any other metallic form of
uranium.[1]
The uranous ion
produces a toxic effect on the living cells by inhibiting
the processes of metabolism of carbohydrates by the
inhibition enzyme systems, particularly hexakinase at the
sites of ATP surface-building through magnesium-hexokinase
mechanism.[2]
Early studies (Gmelin 1824) at the University of Tübingen
on the biological effects of uranium indicated that
uranium salts given by mouth present a hazard as a mild
poison causing death only after intravenous injection.
Intravenous
administration of 600 mg of uranyl nitrate
or 180 mg of uranyl chloride killed a dog within a minute.[3]
There have
been 2,000 nuclear detonations on our planet since
Hiroshima; over five hundred of them conducted above
ground casting uranium and other radioactive substances
into our atmosphere. Then there are events like Three Mile
Island and the huge disaster at Chernobyl. Though these
accidents and above ground tests seem to be far removed
from the present they are not. Background radiation levels
have increased and many of the harmful medical effects are
still waiting to manifest. Radiation does its dirty work
quite slowly when it comes to low level exposures, but its
effect is cumulative. New exposures amplify the biological
vulnerabilities already created by older exposure.
Also there are
the nuclear power sites around the world, which are more
than accidents waiting to happen. They are back holes on
our world, locations destined to be shut down after sixty
or seventy years of use and ordained to be surrounded by
millions of tons of concrete in an effort to seal them off
from the rest of the environment. Already at these sites
are ever increasing mountains of radioactive substances
that no one on earth has found a safe way of disposing of.[4]
However, as
we have seen, the American and British governments think
it’s safe to take some of this radioactive waste and put
it into conventional armaments, and shoot them at people.
And unbeknownst to the public, is that even when these
plants are operating normally they are spilling radiation
into the environment. Most of us though are conditioned
only to worry about a nuclear accident, a melt down or a
nuclear fire. The cost to big government is going to be a
great deal higher than anyone has ever imagined when the
full nuclear tab comes due. Through the ages and
generations to come, people will curse the extreme
shortsightedness of our present crop of leaders who have
led us to the gates of atomic hell.
During one year
of operation, a nuclear reactor
produces as much long-lived radioactive poison
as that released by 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.
GreenPeace
The Russians had first hand experience with atomic hell
when on April 26, 1986 a region populated by about two
million people in Chernobyl, Ukraine, was devastated by an
explosion and meltdown at
their nuclear power plant. The
Chernobyl accident contaminated large parts of the Soviet
Union and Europe. Radioactivity was ultimately detected
everywhere in the northern hemisphere. Mobilizing the
military and evacuating hundreds of thousands of
residents, the emergency cleanup effort involved nearly
750,000 soldiers and firemen. Of those many emergency
workers, some say over half are now dead, and over 250,000
more are dying from various types of cancer. Greenpeace
has estimated that the total death toll total was 100,000.
This epic human tragedy led the Soviet
society on a desperate search for ways to detoxify and
protect their people from radiation poisoning, yet we find
even the Russian authorities trying to deny the staggering
cost in human terms. The total amount of radiation emitted
from the explosion was 200 times that of the atomic bombs
dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The European Committee on Radiation Risk
In
20 years it has become clear that not tens, hundreds or
thousands, but millions of people in the Northern
hemisphere
have suffered and will suffer from the Chernobyl
catastrophe.
Dr.
Alexey V. Yablokov
Russian Academy of Sciences
More than a
third of Britain is still contaminated by radioactivity
from the Chernobyl disaster two decades ago, and children
are getting cancer as a result. An Independent on Sunday
investigation published in London on April 22, 2006, shows
that at least 34 per cent of the country will remain
radioactive for centuries as the result of the accident.
In Britain, about 81,000 sq km (31,000 sq miles) - mainly
in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and the west of
England - were contaminated above 4,000 bequerels per
square metre. The report says the radioactive caesium -
and the doses of radiation it gives Britains - will only
"decline slowly over the next few hundred years".[5]
Greenpeace has
reported that during these last 20 years there have been
200 “near misses” to melt downs cited in US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) documents, eight of which were
considered significant risks of core meltdowns.[6]
Greenpeace says, “As U.S. corporations contemplate
building more nuclear reactors, it is important that our
government regulators remember Chernobyl and speak
honestly and forthrightly about the very real dangers
posed by splitting atoms. Nuclear reactors are, by their
very nature, inherently dangerous. Each reactor has the
potential to devastate the state or region in which it
operates.”
The medical
community must acknowledge that there are powerful winds
of denial regarding uranium exposure and its dangers, just
as there have been with other toxic substances like
mercury, lead, arsenic and fluoride. This is a world wide
phenomenon that was spearheaded by the American government
and the industrial corporations that stood behind it. In
the 1950’s the U.S. government, under the administration
of Dwight Eisenhower, started a large propaganda campaign
to show the world that nuclear weapons, radioactivity, and
radiation were not harbingers of death, but were instead
powerful, benign servants offering almost limitless
benefits to humankind. The "Atoms for Peace" program was
born, explicitly aimed at convincing Americans and the
world that these new technologies were full of hope, and
that nuclear power reactors should be developed with tax
dollars to generate electricity. The promise of this
newest technical advance seemed too good to be true --
electricity "too cheap to meter."[7]
Thomas Edison
abandoned the new field of radiology
quickly, when he recognized the risks involved.
The great
majority of us were fooled by the government. Those who
were not, have done their homework and are tapping us on
our shoulders telling us that these reactors, even during
normal operation, are spilling radiation into the
environment, and that this ‘safe’ or ‘non-existent’
radiation is killing kids with cancer. A new study by
Joseph Mangano was announced in Trenton NJ on March 28,
2006. The study, published in the International Journal of
Health Services, finds that childhood cancer is linked
with normal reactor operations.
Cancer in
children living near the Oyster Creek nuclear reactor rose
after increased levels of radiation entered their bodies.
Study results were obtained by comparing trends in Ocean
and Monmouth County cancer incidence rates of children
under age 10 and radioactive Strontium-90 found in baby
teeth of children. Lab measurements in over 300 New Jersey
baby teeth were used in the study. “These findings
document a link between reactor emissions entering the
human body and increased cancer incidence. It also
reaffirms the well-established principle that there can be
a short period between radiation exposure to the fetus and
infant and the appearance of cancer,” says study author
Joseph Mangano of the Radiation and Public Health Project,
a New York-based research group, which has published 22
articles on radiation health risk.
In the normal
operations of nuclear plants, the evidence is there for
rising infant mortality and damage to the newborn. “Infant
mortality is the most sensitive indicator of radioactive
pollution,” according to Leuren Moret who is part of the
group studying such frightening things. Moret reports
that when the nuclear plant at Rancho Seco was shut down,
children’s mortality dropped 20 percent, and when the
Diablo Canyon plant was turned on the local population was
exposed to enough radiation to drive up the childhood
cancer rates in the local area by 80 percent.[8]
Cancer rates increase most sharply in areas closest to the
nuclear reactors demonstrating clearly that a wrong turn
was made that threatens not only us but future generations
to come. When one looks at breast cancer[9]
statistics plotted out geographically one also sees this
disaster in focus. The nations nuclear reactors are
leaking and women are losing both their breasts and their
lives for it and the medical establishment says
nothing still worrying, as it usually does, only about
viruses.
SAT scores
plunged in the early days of above grown nuclear testing
showing neurological effects and even autism can be
linked, in part, to nuclear generated power. We in the
autism area have mostly plotted out the dramatic rise in
the 1990s to sharp increases in the use of mercury
containing thimerosal in vaccines. But at the same time
radiation levels were increasing. Such plagues as autism
and the dramatic rise in learning disabilities are fueled
by a multitude of converging causes. The principle ones
being heavy metals like aluminum, lead and mercury,
combining with fluoride and aspartame and a myriad of
other toxic chemicals - all interacting with uranium, and
ionizing radiation in the bodies and cells of our beloved
children. Human cells exposed to uranium bond with it and
these other heavy metals and the resultant biochemical
reaction can cause genetic mutations, which in turn can
curtail cell growth and potentially trigger cancer.
All of this
has slammed head on into a nutritional disaster that has
our kids severely malnourished even while they are eating
plenty. This all comes together in synergistic fashion
to create a poisonous field of such potency its amazing
any child lives through it. It seems lost on the
federal government that no nation can survive in the long
run if it continuously damages the mental ability of its
newborn children. But it continues to do this like a beast
eating its own young, destroying its own future, as it
continues to say these toxic metals and radioactive
substances and atomic plants are safe when they are not.
The primary
cause of death from acute radiation injury is usually
infection by normal pathogens during the phase of manifest
illness.
Even minimally symptomatic doses of radiation depress the
immune response and dramatically increase the infectivity
and apparent virulence of biological agents.
Thus it is said
that biological weapons may be significantly more
devastating against an irradiated population. This
depressive influence on immune response is the same
influence that complicates other heavy metal toxicity as
mentioned above.
According to
Dr. Boyd Haley, “Several biological finds have supported
the hypothesis that early exposure of infants to
Thimerosal was the major exacerbation factor in the
increase in autism-related disorders since the advent of
the mandated vaccine program. These initially included the
observations of a genetic susceptibility impairing the
excretion of mercury and the increased retention of
mercury by autistic children. This was followed by data
indicating that autistics have low levels of the natural
compound glutathione that is necessary for the biliary
excretion of mercury, possibly explaining the genetic
susceptibility.”[10]
Both mercury
and uranium sit in the environment like invisible clouds
that have spread out everywhere. With mercury we have
doctors and dentists taking it upon themselves to expose
people to huge increases of mercury by either injecting it
directly with vaccines, or using it as a dental filling.
With uranium we have the United States and Britain blowing
the ‘stuff ’up in distant battlefields only to have the
radioactive poisons drift around the world.
According to
Leuren Moret, the famous Livermore Lab nuclear whistle
blower, a case is easily made for radiation causing the
geometric rise of cancers in the US.-1 in 3 Americans
compared to 1 in 20 before the Second World War It is
also, in part, responsible for the rise in autism,
learning disabilities, chronic immune deficiency disorders
(chronic fatigue syndrome, Epstein-Barr and so forth),
higher rates of infant mortality and the general weakening
of the public's health. The difficulty lies in isolating
one poisonous cause from another since there has been a
great rise in thousands of chemicals that are all mixing
together in peoples’ and even newborns’ blood streams.
It should be
clear though, that everything done with radioactive
substances is dangerous to mankind.
(See next chapter)
The
newest risk is coming from depleted uranium (DU) weapons
and the huge tonnage of material already spilled across
four battlefields. Though greatly concentrated in local
war theatres recent evidence demonstrates that it is being
carried in the high winds to distant lands. With the
different radioactive substances having half lives
measured in thousands, millions and even billions of
years, and with modern medicine in the first world
depending increasingly on diagnostic machines with their
own high levels of radiation, humanity is increasingly
threatened by rising radiation levels as it is with rising
levels of mercury and other toxic chemicals.
If depleted
uranium enters the body it has the
potentiality of causing serious medical consequences.
The associated risk is both chemical and radiological.
U.S. Army Report
1995
Two major
health concerns are related to the use of DU in military
applications: heavy-metal toxicity effects and radiation
effects.
For both health issues, many factors will determine
whether a health effect may result. These factors include
the toxicological dose (how much and how long), route and
magnitude of exposure, and location of embedded fragments
or vapor particles. In addition, other factors including
age, sex, diet, family history, health status, and
lifestyle may affect the overall health effects of
exposure. Lastly is the heavy metal contamination from
other metals. The synergistic effect between chemicals and
heavy metals is the single greatest reality that burdens
each of us today.
Many
scientists and the government itself strongly deny any ill
effects from depleted uranium, and one almost has to be a
physicist to join the discussion and take an educated
position. What seems a universal characteristic about the
denial is, that the true characteristics of depleted
uranium when used on the battlefield, is dramatically
changed after the uranium is burned at high temperatures
and turned into a number of different oxide compounds of
incredibly small size. We shall see more of this in the
following chapter.
It's not
dangerous until it blows up. Depleted uranium is
pyrophoric.
When depleted uranium burns, it releases a radioactive
gas.
It behooves
us to look at what causes radiation poisoning. There are
four kinds of radioactive materials. They are alpha
particles, beta particles, gamma rays, and neutron rays.
You may be exposed to any of these materials accidentally,
either in a purposeful act, or as a dirty bomb.
Alpha particles:
Alpha particles lose energy very quickly in the air. By
the time they are an inch or two (2-5 centimeters) away
from their source they have become harmless. Alpha
particles only go through skin with open cuts or sores.
Alpha particles are stopped by any clothing or even a
piece of paper. If alpha particles are breathed in,
swallowed, or get into a cut or sore on your skin, they
may harm you. Uranium produces alpha particles. An
alpha particle is heavy, has a very short range and is
extremely damaging to cells causing cancer, degenerative
conditions and chromosomal defect, resulting in birth
defects in the offspring of exposed people. The big
and unreported danger of alpha particles is from ingested
uranium for the uranium particles emit their radiation
directly into the local cell tissues.
Beta particles:
Beta particles can travel several feet (1 meter) in open
air. They can burn your skin because they can go through
skin for up to about an inch (2 centimeters). Beta
particles are easily stopped by any solid material,
including heavy clothing. Beta particles are most
dangerous if they are breathed in, swallowed, or get into
a cut or sore on your skin.
Gamma rays:
Gamma rays are higher energy. They are not particles.
Gamma rays travel at the speed of light. They can travel
hundreds to thousands of yards (meters) before their
energy is gone. Gamma rays can pass through many kinds of
materials, including human beings. Gamma rays are stopped
only by distance, or very dense materials like lead. Like
alpha and beta particles, gamma rays can be inhaled from
the air or swallowed with a food or water source. Gamma
rays may affect organs like the liver and stomach, and
other parts deep in your body. These rays destroy tissue
and cause sickness and death.
Neutron rays:
Neutrons are usually the result of fallout. Fallout
happens after an atomic blast. The ground absorbs a lot of
radiation after an atomic blast. The exposed radioactive
ground then rises as a cloud (fallout) and neutrons are
carried by winds to other places. Neutrons can be inhaled
from the air or swallowed with a food or water source.
Neutron radiation damage does not appear to be dose-rate
dependent.
The US State
Department and the Department of Defense categorically
state that there is no link between DU and the diseases
veterans, who have been exposed during the recent gulf
wars, are suffering from. These governmental departments
conveniently choose to omit the fact that Alpha emitters (radionuclides
that emit alpha radiation) are classified as carcinogenic
by all nuclear regulatory and environment health agencies.
Cellular
effects of radiation are basically the same for the
different kinds and doses of radiation. The simplest
effect is cell death. With this effect, the cell is no
longer present to reproduce and perform its primary
function. Changes in cellular function can occur at lower
radiation doses than those that cause cell death. Changes
can include delays in phases of the mitotic cycle,
disrupted cell growth, permeability changes, and changes
in motility. In general, actively dividing cells are most
sensitive to radiation. Radiosensitivity also tends to
vary inversely with the degree of differentiation of the
cell.
Thus Dr. Jawad
Al-Ali, head oncologist at the Saddam teaching hospital in
Basra reported, "Children in particular are susceptible to
depleted uranium poisoning. They have a much higher
absorption rate as their blood is being used to build and
nourish their bones and they have a lot of soft tissues.
Bone cancer and leukemia used to be diseases affecting
them the most, however, cancer of the lymph system, which
can develop anywhere on the body, and has rarely been seen
before the age of 12 is now also common."
Once a
radionuclide is absorbed[11]
it is distributed throughout the body. The rate of
distribution to each organ is related to organ metabolism,
the ease of chemical transport, and the affinity of the
radionuclide for chemicals within the organ. The liver,
kidney, adipose tissue, and bone have higher capacities
for binding radionuclides due to their high protein and
lipid makeup.
The kidneys
though are considered the primary target organs for
uranium chemical toxicity. Nephrotoxicity is a chemically
related risk associated with uranium exposure, and has
been documented in animal studies at high exposure levels.
Like mercury, cadmium, and other heavy-metal ions, excess
uranyl ions depress glomerular function and tubular
secretion of organic anions.[12]
According to the National Academies, “Type 2 diabetes is
reported to be increased in Native American populations. A
disproportionately high fraction of uranium miners were
Native Americans. The complications of diabetes include
CRD (Chronic Renal Disease), which cannot be
differentiated clinically from effects of high doses of
uranium in the kidney.”[13]
Once the
uranium is solubilized in the blood, the kidney will
excrete some of it in urine. Uranium not excreted
distributes to bone and soft tissue, including the kidney,
liver, lung, fat, muscle, and then, to some extent, to all
other organs. Although uranium in the body distributes to
all organs with the main reservoir being the skeleton, the
target organ is the kidney, where functional change is
observed. One of the biggest problems though, to looking
at the health damages done by uranium exposure, has been
the government’s blatant refusal to acknowledge any damage
done to the body until it shows up as renal dysfunction.
The December
2000 Science for Democratic Action -- from the Institute
for Environmental and Energy Research (IEER) -- reports
that, "Some [DU] particles remain in the body where they
can build up in lung [tissue], or enter the blood stream
where it can accumulate in bone tissue." Internal
exposure, the IEER article says, "increases the risk of
leukemia and lung, bone and soft tissue cancers,
particularly when inhaled or ingested."
Iraqis and Kuwaitis
aren't the only ones showing signs of
uranium contamination and sickness. Gulf War veterans,
plagued by a variety of illnesses have been found to have
traces of uranium in their blood, feces, urine and semen.
Dr. Jawad Al-Ali
reported that there are nine people with cancer in his
wife's family. At a conference in Japan in 2004 he stated,
"Two strange phenomena have come about in Basra which I
have never seen before. The first is double and triple
cancers in one patient. For example, leukemia and cancer
of the stomach. We had one patient with 2 cancers - one in
his stomach and kidney. Months later, primary cancer was
developing in his other kidney--he had three different
cancer types. The second is the clustering of cancer in
families.”
[14] These types of multiple
cancer cases are being reported in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan
and Iraq, all nuclear battlefields where DU armaments were
used.
For the
leadership in the United States the thought of Iran
getting the bomb sometime in the next decade is an excuse
for war today, because when all is done, these elite
decision makers are going to protect themselves, their
companies, their profits, etc. And if it takes killing
another 50,000 children or a million to protect their
estates they probably would not think twice since most of
their money is blood money, money created on the suffering
of others. What difference is it to them if they poison
people slowly or more quickly with radiation released
during nuclear war? When war eventually breaks out in Iran
you will be wishing that you had read up on everything to
do with radiation poisoning and what to do about it,
because nuclear war has been reclassified as conventional
with the use of depleted uranium weapons. Every war now
fought by the United States will be a nuclear war. Since
there is no credible source indicating that we are
entering a phase of history where wars will not be fought
we have a lot to worry about.
There is
nothing easy about the diagnosis of heavy metal poisoning
and medical authorities have been known to make fun of
doctors who test for heavy metals, and design treatment
programs to chelate out these metals including uranium. In
following chapters we will talk about chelation and
introduce a natural product called Chelorex[15]
that has been thoroughly tested for the safe removal of
many of the heavy metals including uranium. In reality
there is something we can do about the increased toxicity
every human being is being exposed to and this book will
explore the most natural of these methods, which can
include even the increased use of something as simple as
miso.
Below is a
list of diseases possibly caused by depleted uranium,
which was compiled by Leuren Moret[16]
from interviews with Gulf War Vets and their families. The
problem here is that all of these veterans received a
massive number of vaccines bearing dangerous chemicals.
There is though a central medical theme, soldiers are
being poisoned, first as they leave for the battle
field with up to 17 vaccine shots, and then on the
battlefield with deadly radiation. Put the two poisoning
sources together and medicine has to be deaf, dumb and
blind not to see the effect. Unfortunately for veterans
suffering from the below list of diseases (Gulf War
Syndrome) medicine is so afflicted.